Reliability of Wikipedia Information Questionable
March 7th, 2007
Ryan Jordan, a 24-year old college student from Kentucky used the nickname Essjay on Wikipedia. In his profile he posed as professor of religion at a private university and in this capacity he edited articles and was given the authority to arbitrate disputes between authors and remove site vandalism.
When he was found out, Ryan Jordan admitted that he used books like Catholicism for Dummies as a reference for his writings!
Sites such as Wikipedia have always been susceptible to vandalism and the spread of false information by individuals or groups with a vested interest. This problem has been brought into the spotlight by the case of Mr Jordan, who could be one of many other supposed “authority” writers on the popular site, who actually have no credibility whatsoever.
Tags: accuracast, search, news
Like what you just read?
Rate this post: 
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...Share the site by bookmarking it as a favourite on any of the sites below
Trackback URL. Follow comments on this post through the RSS 2.0 feed.
4 Responses to “Reliability of Wikipedia Information Questionable”
Leave a Reply
You might also want to read the following related posts:
- Google and Wikipedia Off Limits For Brighton Uni Students
- Wikipedia site using NOFOLLOW attribute
- Google’s New Project, Knol, Takes On Wikipedia
Previous / Next stories:
March 7th, 2007 at 1:07 pm
Reliability of Wikipedia Information Questionable…
…
March 8th, 2007 at 6:29 pm
Wikipedia has millions of contributors, and the fact that one of Wikipedia’s most trusted editors is a fraud, while embarrassing, does not make Wikipedia any less reliable than The New Yorker which also bought into the fraud. I’m curious why people keep ignoring that. See - http://blog.xodp.org/2007/03/putting-essjays-fraud-into-perspective.html -.
March 8th, 2007 at 6:36 pm
The very nature of a site like Wikipedia makes it much easier for people to spread the false news.
While Wikipedia is no more at fault than any other newspaper whose reporters tell lies, it gets much more visibility online due to its high search rankings, which is why it’s important for visitors to take information posted on there with a pinch of salt.
January 15th, 2008 at 12:36 pm
Mistakes on Wikipedia are correctable within seconds, due to the sheer mass of users involved. Compare that to mistaken reporting in mainstream media and traditional encyclopaedias…