Reliability of Wikipedia Information Questionable

Add the AccuraCast News gadget to iGoogleMarch 7th, 2007

Ryan Jordan, a 24-year old college student from Kentucky used the nickname Essjay on Wikipedia. In his profile he posed as professor of religion at a private university and in this capacity he edited articles and was given the authority to arbitrate disputes between authors and remove site vandalism.

When he was found out, Ryan Jordan admitted that he used books like Catholicism for Dummies as a reference for his writings!

Sites such as Wikipedia have always been susceptible to vandalism and the spread of false information by individuals or groups with a vested interest. This problem has been brought into the spotlight by the case of Mr Jordan, who could be one of many other supposed “authority” writers on the popular site, who actually have no credibility whatsoever.


Tags: accuracast, search, news

Like what you just read?

Rate this post: (No Ratings Yet)

Loading ... Loading ...

Share the site by bookmarking it as a favourite on any of the sites below

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • View Search Daily News on your Google homepage
  • View Search Daily News on your My Yahoo! homepage
  • View Search Daily News on your My MSN homepage
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Netscape
  • BlogMemes
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Bookmark this article on Google Bookmarks

Email Email This Post To A Friend

Trackback URL. Follow comments on this post through the RSS 2.0 feed.

4 Responses to “Reliability of Wikipedia Information Questionable”

  1. University Update Says:

    Reliability of Wikipedia Information Questionable…

  2. Internet Esquire Says:

    Wikipedia has millions of contributors, and the fact that one of Wikipedia’s most trusted editors is a fraud, while embarrassing, does not make Wikipedia any less reliable than The New Yorker which also bought into the fraud. I’m curious why people keep ignoring that. See - http://blog.xodp.org/2007/03/putting-essjays-fraud-into-perspective.html -.

  3. AccuraCast Says:

    The very nature of a site like Wikipedia makes it much easier for people to spread the false news.

    While Wikipedia is no more at fault than any other newspaper whose reporters tell lies, it gets much more visibility online due to its high search rankings, which is why it’s important for visitors to take information posted on there with a pinch of salt.

  4. Premasagar Says:

    Mistakes on Wikipedia are correctable within seconds, due to the sheer mass of users involved. Compare that to mistaken reporting in mainstream media and traditional encyclopaedias…

Leave a Reply

You might also want to read the following related posts:

Previous / Next stories:

 

Search news and archives


Ensure that your business is marketed to all your potential customers