Controlling Terrorism Via Google AdWords
8th May 2008
Private entrepreneurs are not the only ones using Google’s AdWords platform to showcase their wares. According to an article in the Financial Times, the American Government has been making use of AdWords in a bid to ensnare terrorists and control terrorism.
The United States government are buying AdWords units that link to a page on the America.gov portal, telling America’s side of the story:
http://fpolicy.america.gov/fpolicy/security/
This page shows various subjects of international interest such as America’s foreign policy matters, the up-coming U.S. presidential elections, human rights stories, Middle East topics, peacekeeping, confronting terrorism and the US’s work with NATO.
The (rather unrealistic) intention might be to try and lure terrorists who show an undue interest in these stories and thus crack down on terrorism. The ads are visible to Internet visitor on the content network and to searchers looking for keywords such as “terrorism”, “Middle East peace”, “human rights”, “press freedom”, “renewable energy”, “food aid” and “US elections”. The ads are only shown to Google users in Canada, the UK and the UAE.
Jonathan Margolis from the Bureau of International Information Programs, which has released these ads says, “We are trying to engage, inform and influence foreign audiences. Before you can do either of the last two you have got to find some way to engage them . . . We found that when you launch a website and if you want to attract a target audience, Google ads are a very effective way of drawing people to the site.”
The U.S. government is spending $25,000-$30,000 per month on these ads and and additional $15,000 per month on ads in Farsi and Arabic, which have generated about 300,000 impressions per month.
Surely the US could have thought of better ways to spend that money rather than trying to buy a change in public opinion?
Tags: google, google-adwords, government, terrorism, usa
2 Responses to “Controlling Terrorism Via Google AdWords”
Follow comments on this post through the RSS 2.0 Feed
Add Your Comments
Please Note: We do not use nofollow, but we moderate all comments. Your comment will go live once it has been moderated. You do not need to resubmit it.
Avatars are displayed for users logged in via Facebook or can be created on Gravatar.com, and will appear whenever you leave a comment on a Gravatar-enabled blog.
Trackbacks
Trackback URL. (Right-click the link to copy shortcut / link location.)
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
“Surely the US could have thought of better ways to spend that money rather than trying to buy a change in public opinion?”
Actually isn’t it a more peaceful and fairly inexpensive way to “wage war” on terrorists than, well, waging war on terrorists?
@korien that’s a bit of a chicken & egg statement. If they hadn’t waged that war, they wouldn’t need to spend money on damage control.
Either ways, now that it’s done, rather than try to influence public opinion – face it no one’s gonna believe the “world peace” bit coming from the USA – the US could perhaps spend that money on doing good where it will make a difference, e.g. Burma?