<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg Bar Launched And Exploited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/social-media-7471/digg-bar-launched-and-exploited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/social-media-7471/digg-bar-launched-and-exploited/</link>
	<description>Daily news from the world of Internet &#38; mobile search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:00:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg Adds Nofollow To All Stories That Aren&#8217;t Popular &#124; AccuraCast Search Daily News</title>
		<link>http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/social-media-7471/digg-bar-launched-and-exploited/comment-page-1/#comment-12147</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg Adds Nofollow To All Stories That Aren&#8217;t Popular &#124; AccuraCast Search Daily News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/?p=681#comment-12147</guid>
		<description>[...] A number of experts from the SEO industry have been involved in the creation and derision of the rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; search engine robot directive. Digg has had a few run-ins with these professionals and the rebots instruction method in the not-too-distant past when they launched the DiggBar. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A number of experts from the SEO industry have been involved in the creation and derision of the rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; search engine robot directive. Digg has had a few run-ins with these professionals and the rebots instruction method in the not-too-distant past when they launched the DiggBar. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AccuraCast</title>
		<link>http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/social-media-7471/digg-bar-launched-and-exploited/comment-page-1/#comment-11207</link>
		<dc:creator>AccuraCast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/?p=681#comment-11207</guid>
		<description>If you read Gray&#039;s blog post about this, his point was that you could essentially put your content on a Digg.com domain URL, which carries more weight (digg.com domain), and so is more likely to make your content rank higher.

However, as the update points out, Digg has added a robots noindex tag and the canonical tag on the main page to prevent SEO issues / exploitation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you read Gray&#8217;s blog post about this, his point was that you could essentially put your content on a Digg.com domain URL, which carries more weight (digg.com domain), and so is more likely to make your content rank higher.</p>
<p>However, as the update points out, Digg has added a robots noindex tag and the canonical tag on the main page to prevent SEO issues / exploitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogaboutnothingatall</title>
		<link>http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/social-media-7471/digg-bar-launched-and-exploited/comment-page-1/#comment-11206</link>
		<dc:creator>blogaboutnothingatall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/?p=681#comment-11206</guid>
		<description>&quot;As Michael Gray points out, the DiggBar frames a page and assigns it a Digg.com URL, which can be exploited for SEO benefit by unscrupulous affiliate publishers.&quot; I don&#039;t under how this bar can be exploited? Is the link a nofollow now? It is something like digg.com/adsf78r</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As Michael Gray points out, the DiggBar frames a page and assigns it a Digg.com URL, which can be exploited for SEO benefit by unscrupulous affiliate publishers.&#8221; I don&#8217;t under how this bar can be exploited? Is the link a nofollow now? It is something like digg.com/adsf78r</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AccuraCast</title>
		<link>http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/social-media-7471/digg-bar-launched-and-exploited/comment-page-1/#comment-11195</link>
		<dc:creator>AccuraCast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/?p=681#comment-11195</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Update:&lt;/strong&gt; Digg have clarified that they place a robots &quot;noindex&quot; tag in the framed pages, so they will not pose a problem for SEO after all. 
Digg also uses the canonical tag and links to the original source, to prevent SEO duplication problems for the source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update:</strong> Digg have clarified that they place a robots &#8220;noindex&#8221; tag in the framed pages, so they will not pose a problem for SEO after all.<br />
Digg also uses the canonical tag and links to the original source, to prevent SEO duplication problems for the source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
