<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook + Google = Yet Another Acquisition Rumour?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/social-media-7471/facebook-google-yet-another-acquisition-rumour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/social-media-7471/facebook-google-yet-another-acquisition-rumour/</link>
	<description>Daily news from the world of Internet &#38; mobile search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:00:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Acquisition Wars: Microsoft v Google &#124; AccuraCast Search Daily News</title>
		<link>http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/social-media-7471/facebook-google-yet-another-acquisition-rumour/comment-page-1/#comment-13172</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook Acquisition Wars: Microsoft v Google &#124; AccuraCast Search Daily News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/social-media-7471/facebook-google-yet-another-acquisition-rumour/#comment-13172</guid>
		<description>[...] Google has expressed an interest in Facebook in the past, but was turned down by Facebook&#8217;s owners, who want to grow the company internally and eventually take it public. Their strategy is definitely working so far, as one year down the line the value of the company is being estimated at 5 times what its owners wanted for it in 2006. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google has expressed an interest in Facebook in the past, but was turned down by Facebook&#8217;s owners, who want to grow the company internally and eventually take it public. Their strategy is definitely working so far, as one year down the line the value of the company is being estimated at 5 times what its owners wanted for it in 2006. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
