<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr To Get Video &#8211; Soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/social-media-7471/flickr-to-get-video%e2%80%93soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/social-media-7471/flickr-to-get-video%e2%80%93soon/</link>
	<description>Daily news from the world of Internet &#38; mobile search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:16:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amandeep Bath</title>
		<link>http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/social-media-7471/flickr-to-get-video%e2%80%93soon/comment-page-1/#comment-4080</link>
		<dc:creator>Amandeep Bath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.accuracast.com/search-daily-news/social-media-7471/flickr-to-get-video%e2%80%93soon/#comment-4080</guid>
		<description>Flickr has always been a good source for sharing images and will still continue to do so. In the case of sharing videos, I think Yahoo might surely speed up with something to catch up with YouTube. I&#039;m sure they don&#039;t want to always be second to YouTube. But they don&#039;t have a choice as they&#039;re too late already, because too many users don&#039;t like shifting services, once they&#039;re used to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flickr has always been a good source for sharing images and will still continue to do so. In the case of sharing videos, I think Yahoo might surely speed up with something to catch up with YouTube. I&#8217;m sure they don&#8217;t want to always be second to YouTube. But they don&#8217;t have a choice as they&#8217;re too late already, because too many users don&#8217;t like shifting services, once they&#8217;re used to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
